‘White-Collar Bloodbath’: Anthropic Warns of AI Job Losses
Dario Amodei, the CEO of Anthropic, has issued a stark warning about the impact that AI will have on the job market imminently.
Dario, who leads one of the world's most influential AI companies, is forecasting nothing short of mass unemployment.
“AI could wipe out half of all entry-level white-collar jobs — and spike unemployment to 10-20% in the next one to five years,” he told reporters from his San Francisco office.
If job losses are as severe as the upper bracket of Dario’s prediction suggests, the US would experience its rate of unemployment since the Great Depression.
His warning extends across multiple sectors, with technology, finance, law and consulting particularly vulnerable to automation.
“Most of them are unaware that this is about to happen,” he told Axios recently, referring to workers who remain oblivious to the threat.
“It sounds crazy and people just don't believe it.”
From augmentation to automation
Today, AI models and tools are primarily used as an ‘augmentation’ to the work carried out by human employees, with document summarisation, contract reviews, research and email writing among the most common use cases.
These are the kinds of services provided by Anthropic’s Claude, one of the most popular LLMs on the market.
But Dario believes that AI’s role will transition more towards ‘automation’ in the near future, bringing businesses to an inflection point they may not be prepared to reckon with.
“It's going to happen in a small amount of time — as little as a couple of years or less,” he explains.
Currently, hundreds of technology companies are developing agentic AI systems designed to perform human work “instantly, indefinitely and exponentially cheaper”.
Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Meta, is of a similar belief. He projects that mid-level programmers across sectors may become redundant in the coming years.
“Probably in 2025, we at Meta, as well as the other companies that are basically working on this, are going to have an AI that can effectively be a sort of mid-level engineer,” he said in January.
Are AI-driven job losses already happening?
In May, Microsoft announced it was laying off roughly 3% of its workforce, with around 6,000 employees being made redundant. According to Axios, many of that number are engineers.
Elsewhere, Walmart has laid off 1,500 staff in an effort to simplify its operations, with the Wall Street Journal reporting that the retail giant has started using automation to cut labour in its supply chain.
CrowdStrike, a Texas-based cybersecurity firm, has also made cuts, with 500 workers set to lose their jobs. The company stated that it was at “a market and technology inflection point, with AI reshaping every industry”.
The keenest observers have been looking at the big picture for some time now.
Aneesh Raman, the Chief Economic Opportunity Officer at LinkedIn, recently wrote a column for the New York Times which argued that AI is already breaking “the bottom rungs of the career ladder”, with junior software developers, paralegals and retail workers at high risk.
What is the solution?
As the CEO of one of the world’s most influential AI companies, there’s an obvious paradox in the warnings of Dario Amodei.
But despite building the technology that is driving these changes, Dario is advocating for proactive measures that will mitigate or prevent any negative impacts that the rise of AI might have on the job market.
Firstly, he wants more transparency from AI companies and governments when it comes to the implications that AI might have on the global workforce.
“We, as the producers of this technology, have a duty and an obligation to be honest about what is coming,” he says.
He also suggests that a “token tax” could provide a degree of equity.
His idea is to have AI companies contribute 3% of their revenues to government redistribution programmes, which could compensate workers that have been pushed out by AI.
“Obviously, that's not in my economic interest,” he says, “but I think that would be a reasonable solution to the problem.”
Will regulators protect workers?
In an effort to facilitate the AI boom, many world leaders are adopting a laissez-faire attitude towards regulation.
In the US, for instance, US President Donald Trump has suggested imposing a ten-year-long moratorium on AI regulation, which Dario believes is “far too blunt” to deal with the potential negative impacts AI could bring about if left unchecked.
“You can't just step in front of the train and stop it,” he says.
“The only move that's going to work is steering the train — steer it 10 degrees in a different direction from where it was going.”
Explore the latest edition of Technology Magazine and be part of the conversation at our global conference series, Tech & AI LIVE.
Discover all our upcoming events and secure your tickets today.
Technology Magazine is a BizClik brand