Court orders Binance to trace cryptocurrency hackers
The move comes after one of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges’ users said it was the victim of a $2.6 million hack. In a judgement made public this week, a High Court Judge granted requests by artificial intelligence company, Fect.ai for Binance to take steps to identify the hackers and then track and seize the assets.
Although involving a relatively small sum in the industry, the case is one of the first public ones involving Binance and will be a test of the English court system’s ability to tackle fraud on cryptocurrency platforms.
A Binance spokesperson said: “ Binance routinely freezes accounts that are identified as having suspicious activity occurring in line with our security policies and commitment to ensuring that users are protected while using our platform.”
Binance, which has an opaque corporate structure, has faced intense regulatory scrutiny amid a worldwide crackdown on cryptocurrencies. This has been triggered over concerns that such exchanges could be used for money laundering or to allow consumers to fall victim to scams or runaway bets.
It has said it is committed to complying with appropriate local rules wherever it operates and has expanded its international compliance team and advisory board.
"We need to dispel the myth that crypto assets are anonymous. The reality is that with the right rules and applications they can be tracked, traced and recovered," Syedur Rahman, a partner at Rahman Ravelli, which is representing Fetch.ai.
Proving crypto fraud
Fetch.ai, which is incorporated in England and Singapore and develops AI projects for blockchain databases, alleges fraudsters hacked their way into its cryptocurrency accounts on the Binance exchange on June 6. Unable to remove the assets because of account restrictions, they allegedly sold them to a linked third party at a fraction of their value in under an hour.
Rahman said Binance, which had notified Fetch.AI of unusual activity in its account, had already frozen a sum and had indicated it would comply with the orders. The claimants will have to prove they are victims of fraud before seeking a recovery order.
